Increase in cigarette prices associated with lower baby deaths

0

A 10-year study of median cigarette prices and infant mortality conducted by researchers at the Imperial College London and some other European institutes shows that an increase of €1 (US $1.18) per pack in the median cigarette price was associated with a decline of 0.23 deaths per 1000 live births in the same year.

While the study published in JAMA Pediatrics tracked 53 704 641 live births in 23 European nations during the 2004-2014 study period, the findings are particularly significant for India which has the largest number of under five child deaths in the world. An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study published recently in The Lancet revealed that in 2016, 0.9 million children aged under 5 years died in India – the highest in the world, more than some of the poorest countries in the world.

India has also, for some months now been going through a phase of self doubt in its tobacco control measures with organisations affiliated to the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh (RSS) accusing foreign donors of trifling with the interests of poor tobacco farmers of India. There has been a crackdown on the Public Health Foundation of India and several other organisation partnering the government on tobacco control for alleged violations of the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act (FCRA). Significantly, while the new GST regime puts tobacco in the highest tax bracket of 28%, the taxes on all tobacco products except bidis have since actually gone marginally down.

“…an increase of €1 per pack in the median cigarette price was associated with 0.23 fewer deaths per 1000 live births (95% CI, –0.37 to –0.09) in the same year and an additional 0.16 fewer deaths per 1000 live births in the following year (95% CI, –0.30 to –0.03). An increase of 10% in the price differential between median and minimum cigarette price was associated with 0.07 more deaths per 1000 live births (95% CI, 0.01-0.13) the following year, while the association was nonsignificant in the same year (β, –0.04; 95% CI, –0.08 to 0.01),”the study found.

Apart from Imperial College, Researchers from Erasmus University Medical Centre–Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam and Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh participated in the study. While the health benefits of higher tobacco taxation have been elucidated in multiple studies across the world, this is the first quantitative correlation between tobacco pricing and infant mortality across such a large number of countries. There were however previous studies in USA, UK and Canada linking higher tobacco prices with reduced child deaths.

The JAMA study concluded: “Higher cigarette prices were associated with reduced infant mortality, while increased cigarette price differentials were associated with higher infant mortality in the European Union. Combined with other evidence, this research suggests that legislators should implement tobacco tax and price control measures that eliminate budget cigarettes.”

The tobacco tax structure in India is such that apart from GST there is a cess on all products except bidis. All taken together it comes to about 50-55% which is not low but still not upto the levels recommended by WHO.

“WHO recommends a 70-75% tax on tobacco the retail price. In India it is in the 50-55% range, so there is a very large room for improvement. Post GST taxes on cigarettes and smokeless tobacco have actually gone down; by about 1-2% for cigarettes and by 4-5% for smokeless products. It has though gone up marginally for bidis, by about 1-2%,”says a researcher who works on tobacco economics.

A study of the economics of tobacco and tobacco taxation in India done by researchers including those from PHFI, University of Illinois at Chicago and Centre for Global Health Research, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, estimated that over 120 million Indians smoke, and 10% of the world’s tobacco smokers live in India. India has the second largest group of smokers in the world after China. Almost a third of Indians—57% of all men and 11% of all women—consume some form of tobacco and many use more than one type of tobacco products. Bidis are the most popular tobacco product used in India. Bidis account for nearly 85% of total smoked tobacco in India.

3 candidates in contention for a new TB vaccine; BCG is passé

2

An international TB research consortium has zeroed in upon three possible candidates for trials into a new TB vaccine.

There is already an existing vaccine – the Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine – that is a part of the immunisation programme of most TB endemic countries including India – but its efficacy is in doubt. Besides given the propensity of the TB bacteria to mutate into drug resistant forms a new vaccine is the need of the hour, felt speakers at the recently concluded First Global MInisterial Meet on Tuberculosis organised by WHO in Moscow.

Of the three molecules in contention for trials one, which is a recombinant BCG vaccine is essentially the live Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria. Of the other two “killed varieties” one is of Indian provenance – the Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) – named after the man who discovered it – former director of the National Institutes of Immunology and the father of Immunology in India, Dr Gursharan Prasad Talwar. The bacteria is already being used for a leprosy vaccine which was recently piloted in Gujarat. The other has been developed by an institute based in Dartmouth. “The trials will take some time to start,” said DG ICMR Dr Soumya Swaminathan on Wednesday.

For India TB vaccine research is of crucial importance on way to its accelerated target of eliminating the disease by 2025 – ahead of the global deadline of 2035 – because it has the world’s largest number of TB patients. According to the National Strategic Plan for Tuberculosis Elimination 2017-25 that India adopted earlier this year, “TB kills an estimated 480,000 Indians every year and more than 1,400 every day.” Despite a 2012 notification making it mandatory that the government be informed of all new TB cases, there are still a million missing TB cases in India which means these people may not only be spreading the disease, worse still if they have not completed the TB medication course, they may even be spreading drug resistance forms of the disease.

ICMR is also starting a one of its kind nutrition-TB linkage study in Jharkhand where families of 2000 TB patients will be given a calorie and protein rich diet to see if that made an impact on their propensity to develop TB. India has a huge population with what is known as “latent” TB infection, individuals who are carriers of the disease but do not spread it till they become active. That “activation” it has long been believed is a function of the nutrition status of the individual.

“TB is known to be a disease of malnutrition. So the Jharkhand study is the first of its kind where we will explore whether there is indeed a link. The TB elimination plan talks of nutrition incentives for TB patients but this study will provide evidence if that is something that the government should invest in,” Dr Swaminathan added.

Govt ceded space to pvt sector in health, Fortis a symptom of the disease

0

A top notch health tourism destination, complicated surgeries and “star” doctors many of whom are the pioneers in their respective fields – India’s private healthcare system enjoys a glorious international reputation. It is in short a stark contrast to the state of the public health sector. A 2007 paper published in the Economic and Political Weekly notes, “…high absenteeism, low quality in clinical care, low satisfaction levels with care (clinical and with regards to courtesy and amenities) and rampant corruption plague the [public health] system.” It is something that the private sector never fails to remind us about in times such as now when its business model is facing countless questions after Fortis Gurugram billed the family of 7-year-old Aadya Singh – who eventually died of dengue – Rs 15 lakh plus for a fortnight’s stay in the  hospital.

Since the 1990s India has pursued a policy of privatisation – especially of the health and pharmaceutical sectors with the public sector all but handing over the baton to the private.

It is important to understand that India’s persistent push towards privatisation in healthcare since the 90s isn’t as much a testimony to the efficiency of the private sector, as it is a compensation for the lack of a robust public health system.

This despite the fact that  Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Indian Constitution that enshrine respectively the rights to life, equality and non-discrimination are additively interpreted to arrive at a Right to Health. The Constitution  lays down in Article 47 of the Directive Principles of State Policy; “Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to improve public health.—The State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health.”

To that extent right to health is at least as much enshrined in the Constitution as the state’s duty to prevent cow slaughter – the very next article.

Nevertheless conditions have been created for not just the thriving of the private sector but its unregulated profiteering – as opposed to a for profit business model – as Aadya’s tragic case has brought to light once more. In a fantastic convergence of minds, Centre and the states often ranged at opposite ends of the political spectrum have somehow or the other put off regulation of the private sector. There are some exceptions, admittedly. West Bengal government’s stringent Clinical Establishments Act happened after a comparable incident in the state earlier this year and now the Karnataka government is attempting to bring its own law much to the chagrin of big names in the private sector including Dr Devi Shetty’s Narayana Hrudayalaya. On the whole though, seven years after the Centre passed a model law, The Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 precisely for the purpose of regulating the private sector, states’ uptake has been very poor.

The functioning of the medical profession has been kept deliberately vague – there are standard treatment guidelines available now for many medical conditions and diseases but implementation is non-existent. Regulation has been kept in the hands of a handful of politically connected doctors whose sole purpose is to preserve the smokescreen and perpetuate their own interests rather than cleanse the system. Government whose job it is to regulate has or years been making the right noises about public private partnerships in healthcare but has been remarkably sloth in getting regulations and regulators in place which has to be the first step if government whose stated policy is transparency is to work with the private sector at any level. Poor penetration of health insurance that could have been a de facto regulator in its own interest has made even that filter ineffective.

In short that the private hospital business model is opaque and exorbitant is actually a gift government of India has decided to give them. It is a small detail that we pay the price of.

Virus-free. www.avast.com

Inquire into Fortis overcharging: Centre to Haryana

0
Union Health Secretary Preeti Sudan

Day after the internet exploded about reports of how Fortis Hospital Gurugram had run a bill of more than Rs 15 lakh for the treatment of a 7-year-old dengue patient, Union health secretary Preeti Sudan has written to the principal secretary health in Haryana asking him to institute an inquiry into the incident.

“Such incidents have an extremely deleterious impact on the faith of the general public in the healthcare system in the country. It is our duty to ensure that quality care and treatment is provided to persons in need and that it is provided at a fair and affordable price. I request you to urgently initiate an inquiry into the whole incident,” Sudan has written to Haryana principal secretary health and family welfare Amit Jha.

The reference is to the death of seven-year-old Aadya Singh who died in the Gurugram Hospital in September this year.

Just before Aadya, who had suffered more than 70% brain damage was taken off the ventilator after two weeks of hospitalisation, her father was billed Rs 15,59,322, including the price of 611 syringes – the figure would mean Aadya was given 43 injections every day – and 1546 pair of gloves.

The massive accumulation of fluid in her body meant that Aadya would not fit into the clothes that she had come to the hospital in. Also included in the bill is Rs 900 as the cost of the hospital gown the little girl wore when she was taken out of Fortis to a different hospital where they would issue her a death certificate.

Fortis on its part has issued a detailed statement about the complications Aadya had developed as a result of dengue and the steps taken for her treatment. “At each step, patient’s family was briefed about the critical condition of the child. On 12.09.17, a multidisciplinary consult team (MDCT) also met with the patient’s relatives including her father and told them about the guarded prognosis of the child, which was documented in IPD records and signed by the patient’s father. On 14.09.17, a MRI Brain was done after explaining to the parents, the possible complications of transfer in such a critically ill child. MRI brain showed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement and extensive hemorrhages, which suggested a poor outcome. Patient’s family was again explained about the critical condition of the child, after which they took the decision to take the child Leave Against Medical Advice (LAMA),” the statement said

Virus-free. www.avast.com

Antibiotics levels in meat specified

0

The Union ministry of health has notified amendments to the Food Safety & Standards (Contaminants, Toxins & Residues) Regulations, 2011 on 7th November, 2017. The notification contains maximum permissible limits of various antibiotics in meat and meat products including chicken.

Anti microbial resistance is a matter of global concern with the exposure of humans to antibiotics used in meat and poultry products often contributing to the development of their resistance to commonly used antibiotics. India is in the process of adopting a policy that is mainly based on tracking of patients and sale of antibiotics.

In the newly notified amendments, maximum permissible limits of 37 antibiotics and 67 other veterinary drugs are prescribed for chicken.

The government has invited objections and suggestions from all the stakeholders including general public within 30 days of the notification i.e. by 6th December, 2017.  The objections & suggestions received will be placed before the Scientific Panel of FSSAI on Residues of Pesticides and Antibiotics for consideration.  The recommendations of the Scientific Panel will be considered by the Scientific Committee and then the Food Authority for approval after which it will be notified in the Gazette of India which will make it the official law of the land